Trying to get to dispel the notion which the officer was “cantankerous”, Sankaranarayanan mentioned there was only one infraction, and only the commandant had a dilemma with it, not another troops. He said Kamalesan had no issue coming into the Sarva Dharma Sthal.Bench suggests officer a 'misfit for the Indian Army' and somebody who allowed his

Becoming a commander, he should not to get insulted other cadets inside the troop by such carry out, and as an alternative, he ought to have led with the front, the Court claimed.The bench responded which the officer acted out of "religious ego", disregarding even pastoral assistance. "He suggests he would not enter these a place regardless of whet

Being a commander, he should not to get insulted other cadets in the troop by these types of carry out, and instead, he must have led in the entrance, the Court mentioned.The bench responded the officer acted out of "religious ego", disregarding even pastoral advice. "He suggests he wouldn't enter this sort of an area even though it experienced a c